Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

You are here: Home Our Resources Library Citations A comparison of munic...

A comparison of municipal forest benefits and costs in Modesto and Santa Monica, California, USA

Reference Type
Journal, Research (Article)

This paper presents a comparison of the structure, function, and value of street and park tree populations in two California cities. [UMN]

This paper presents a comparison of the structure, function, and value of street and park tree populations in two California cities. Trees provided net annual benefits valued at $2.2 million in Modesto and $805,732 in Santa Monica. Benefit-cost ratios were 1.85:1 and 1.52:1 in Modesto and Santa Monica, respectively. Residents received $1.85 and $1.52 in annual benefits for every $1 invested in management. Aesthetic and other benefits accounted for 50% to 80% of total annual benefits, while expenditures for pruning accounted for about 50% of total annual costs. Although these results were similar, benefits and costs were distributed quite differently in each city. Variations in tree sizes and growth rates, foliation characteristics, prices, residential property values, and climate were chiefly responsible for different benefits and costs calculated on a per tree basis. [Abstract]

Authors
E.G. McPherson, J.R. Simpson
Date Published
2002
Journal/Conference
Urban Forestry and Urban Greening
Publisher
Urban & Fischer, Elsevier GmbH
Publisher Location
Jena (DEU)
ISBN/ISSN
1618-8667
Volume/Issue/Number
1//2
Start Page
61
End Page
74
Sub-Topics
Economics/Cost-Benefit Analysis, Inventory (tree)
Keywords
Economic Benefits of Urban Forests
Libraries
UMN
Personal tools

powered by Southern Regional Extension Forestry