Wooded area does not constitute "necessary support land" for tax assessment purposes
Journal, Research (Article)
[This Case in Brief] deals with the ruling of the Tax Court of Indiana on the case filed by Elkhart Maple Lane Associates LP to challenge the tax assessment conducted by the county tax assessment board of appeals in Elkhart County, Indiana. [It concerns the] claim of Maple Lane regarding the classification of the wooded areas between apartment buildings.
[Ti: Wooded area does not constitute "necessary support land" for tax assessment purposes]
[Au: , , ,]
[So: Appraisal Journal 72(1):3-4.]
[Ky: History and Legislation]]
2004
Appraisal Journal 72(1):3-4.
Appraisal Journal 72(1):3-4.
NA
General History of UF
History and Legislation
UMN