![](https://urbanforestrysouth.org/umn.gif)
Perceptions of the rural-urban fringe: citizen preferences for natural and developed settings
Journal, Research (Article)
In this study, 510 farmers, township planning commissioners, and other citizens living in Washtenaw County, Michigan, provided preference ratings for 32 pictures taken at the rural-urban fringe. They preferred settings including both farm and forest. Participants also preferred housing developments with mature trees over developments with few trees, and preferred settings with single family housing over those with multiple family housing.
[Ti: Perceptions of the rural-urban fringe: citizen preferences for natural and developed settings]
[Au: Sullivan, W.C., III, , ,]
[So: Landscape and Urban Planning 29:85-101.]
[Ky: Aesthetic Benefits of Urban Forests]]
[Issue/Page: 29:85-101]
W.C. Sullivan III
1994
Landscape and Urban Planning
Elsevier
Amsterdam (NL)
0169-2046
/29:85-101/
Aesthetics
Aesthetic Benefits of Urban Forests
UMN