|
|
- Info
Deer dilemma: Accommodating a love-hate relationship
| Author: |
Franklin, Thomas M. |
| Date: |
1997 |
| Periodical: |
Wildlife Society Bulletin |
| Abstract: |
Whatever the approach, it is clear that wildlife professionals must be proactive in addressing deer abundance problems. If we fail to respond to the growing public concern and demand for assistance, then others will fill that role. If citizens do not receive adequate response from wildlife agencies, then they likely will turn to public health, animal control, agricultural protection, or environmental agencies to fill the void. If these agencies don't respond adequately, elected officials are likely to pass new laws that may or may not consider the best interests of the wildlife resource. In this age of increasing management by referendum, professionals cannot afford to abdicate responsibility for solving wildlife-related challenges. Publicly acceptable deer management plans must involve all stakeholders. Many professionals would like to make all the decisions affecting wildlife, but recent experience with deer management programs in hunting-restricted areas has demonstrated that acceptable programs require broad public involvement. In suburban Montgomery County, Maryland, and in Gettysburg National Park, Pennsylvania, a common key to successful deer management was community awareness, trust, public involvement, and effective communication. Whether people love deer or hate them, the answer to their stewardship is skillful application of sound science, education, and communication. |
|
