Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

You are here: Home Our Resources Literature Benefits and costs of...

Benefits and costs of forestry best management practices in Virginia

Author: Aust, W.M., R.M. Shaffer, and J.A. Burger
Date: 1995
Periodical: Southern Journal of Applied Forestry
Abstract: Benefits and costs of Virginia's forestry best management practices (BMPs) were estimated for the Mountains, Piedmont, and Coastal Plain regions using three actual nonregulatory phases and one theoretical regulatory phase of forest water quality protection. The four phases ranged from passive, nonregulatory to regulatory BMPs with increasingly restrictive provisions. As the level of regulation increased, the benefit: cost ratio decreased, indicating that costs were accruing at a proportionately greater rate than benefits. This pattern was most pronounced in the Coastal Plain region where average erosion rates were low, and substantial acreages were harvested. Results suggested that an aggressive, nonregulatory BMP program is the most efficient approach to forest water quality protection assuming that overall program compliance levels are sufficient to satisfy society's needs.


Personal tools

powered by Southern Regional Extension Forestry