|
|
|
The last
to include in this section are Areas of Assessment and Mitigation by Table.
|
|
Explain
the table and its use for field verification in this section.
|
|
|
|
Here is
the image of the overall worksheet produced from the information derived from
|
|
the
UTRI. The user will complete up to the inspection level and include that
detailed
|
|
Information
in the next section.
|
|
|
|
This
table is used during field verification to verify that the UTRI ranking is
correct or
|
|
not at
each location and to notate necessary mitigation required, if any.
|
|
|
|
If the
UTRI ranking is not correct it will be necessary to adjust the ranking to a
higher or
|
|
lower
ranking which in turn will change that road segments’ inspection schedule
accordingly.
|
|
|
|
The
worksheet, which includes Right of Way Road Segments listed by priority (very
high,
|
|
high,
moderate, and low), utilizes initial tree evaluations and mitigation steps
recommended
|
|
and
completed.
|
|
|
|
After
field verifications are made, the results for action needed are placed in the
Mitigation column
|
|
|
|
The
worksheet therefore guides the mitigation work. Mitigation might include pruning, removing,
|
|
or
taking no action. Mitigation, if any,
will be listed in the Mitigation column.
Of course, a detailed
|
|
spreadsheet
or another mechanism of tracking work planning will need to be developed or
tallied to
|
|
total
number of trees for prunes and removals as well as size of tree by caliper,
etc.
|
|
|